<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-17T20:06:25Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/ASJU-3882">https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/oai</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/ASJU-3882</identifier><setSpec>ALL</setSpec><datestamp>2025-10-25T06:23:26Z</datestamp></header><metadata> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>https://www.bilketa.eus/ark:/27020/ASJU-3882</dc:identifier><dc:creator>Gallego, Ángel J.</dc:creator><dc:source>ASJU, 3882</dc:source><dc:date>2007-04-13</dc:date><dc:description>The goal of this paper is to put forward an analysis of relative clauses which builds on Pesetsky &amp; Torrego's (2001) proposal concerning the C-T connection and the nature of Case. In so doing, a unitary answer to two long-standing puzzles of the relative clause realm will be provided: the absence of both that-deletion and overt relative pronouns (unless introduced by a preposition) in Romance languages.</dc:description><dc:description>The goal of this paper is to put forward an analysis of relative clauses which builds on Pesetsky &amp; Torrego's (2001) proposal concerning the C-T connection and the nature of Case. In so doing, a unitary answer to two long-standing puzzles of the relative clause realm will be provided: the absence of both that-deletion and overt relative pronouns (unless introduced by a preposition) in Romance languages.</dc:description><dc:description>The goal of this paper is to put forward an analysis of relative clauses which builds on Pesetsky &amp; Torrego's (2001) proposal concerning the C-T connection and the nature of Case. In so doing, a unitary answer to two long-standing puzzles of the relative clause realm will be provided: the absence of both that-deletion and overt relative pronouns (unless introduced by a preposition) in Romance languages.</dc:description><dc:identifier>https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/3882/3496</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/3882</dc:identifier><dc:relation>vignette : https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/Thumb/image?id=ark:/27020/ASJU-3882&amp;mat=articleNum</dc:relation><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:rights>Copyright (c) 2015 Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"</dc:rights><dc:title>Phase theory, case and relative clauses</dc:title></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>