2026-05-17T18:57:12Zhttps://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/oai

oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/ASJU-9725ALL2025-10-25T06:25:00Z

https://www.bilketa.eus/ark:/27020/ASJU-9725Egurtzegi, AnderASJU, 97252011-06-06Metatesiak, orokorrean katea fonikoaren sekuentziaren segmentu edo ezaugarrien edozein ordena aldaketa bezala ulertzen dena, bere sailkapen tipologikoan aurrerapen handia jaso du Blevins eta Garretten (1998, 2004) lanari esker, bai bilakabidearen analisian eta baita bere ezagutzan ere. Haien modeloa jarraituz, euskaraz historikoki izan diren metatesi prozesuak analizatu ditut eta hauen motibazioa identifikatu, zeina fonetikoa den. Hipotesi nagusitzat metatesia bilakabide fonetikoki naturala dela eta beste edozein prozesu fonologiko ulertzeko beharrezkoak diren aurreikuspenen bitartez analiza daitekeela izango dut.   Bi metatesi prozesu bereiziko ditut: lehendabizikoa segmentu bakar baten lekualdatzea da, bigarrenak bi segmenturen kokapenak trukatzen dituen bitartean. Lehenengoa bereizgarri fonetiko luzeak (Ohala 1981) dituzten ezaugarri fonologikoei dagokie eta bigarrena segmentu bikote mugatuek aurrera eramaten duten transposizio ez-lokala da, bikote hauek betiere haien ekoizpenean antzekotasunen bat azaltzen dutelarik eta silabaren barnean kokapen berdinean kokatzen direla, i.e. bi bokalak nukleoan edota bi kontsonanteak koda edo ekinean.   Lan honek euskaratik harturiko ebidentzia berria gehitzen dio metatesia arrazoi fonetikoek eragindako prozesu natural bezala analizatzeko xedeari, honakoa emaitzak gidaturiko edozein prozesuk dituen ezaugarri orokorretan oinarriturik (Ohala 1981, 1993) bideratzen dela arrazoi artikulatorioekin batera, mugimendu plangintzan sorturiko akatsak kasu (Garrett & Johnson).The typological classification of metathesis, which is usually best understood as any reordering of segments or features within the phonological string, has experimented a great step forward in terms of analysis and understanding of the phenomenon as a consequence of the work of Blevins & Garrett (1998, 2004). Following their model, I have analyzed the different metathesis processes found historically within the Basque language and identified the underlying motivation, which is phonetic in nature. The main hypothesis is that metathesis is a phonetically natural process that can be analyzed following the same assumptions made for any other phonological change.   I will distinguish two kinds of metathesis processes, the first involves a single segment being relocated in the phonological string whereas the second interchanges a pair of (different) segments. The former can only involve features bearing elongated phonetic cues (Ohala 1981), and the latter is a nonlocal two-segment transposition involving restricted pairs of vowel or consonants that are similarly produced to some extent, and that are usually located in the same position of two adjacent syllables, i.e. two vowels in the nucleus or two consonants either in onset or coda position.   This work adds new evidence taken from Basque to further develop the analysis of metathesis as a phonetically natural process that is produced by phonetic reasons, based on the common properties of any output driven process (Ohala 1981, 1993), along with articulatory reasons such as motor planning errors (Garrett & Johnson).The typological classification of metathesis, which is usually best understood as any reordering of segments or features within the phonological string, has experimented a great step forward in terms of analysis and understanding of the phenomenon as a consequence of the work of Blevins & Garrett (1998, 2004). Following their model, I have analyzed the different metathesis processes found historically within the Basque language and identified the underlying motivation, which is phonetic in nature. The main hypothesis is that metathesis is a phonetically natural process that can be analyzed following the same assumptions made for any other phonological change.   I will distinguish two kinds of metathesis processes, the first involves a single segment being relocated in the phonological string whereas the second interchanges a pair of (different) segments. The former can only involve features bearing elongated phonetic cues (Ohala 1981), and the latter is a nonlocal two-segment transposition involving restricted pairs of vowel or consonants that are similarly produced to some extent, and that are usually located in the same position of two adjacent syllables, i.e. two vowels in the nucleus or two consonants either in onset or coda position.   This work adds new evidence taken from Basque to further develop the analysis of metathesis as a phonetically natural process that is produced by phonetic reasons, based on the common properties of any output driven process (Ohala 1981, 1993), along with articulatory reasons such as motor planning errors (Garrett & Johnson).https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/9725/8965https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/9725vignette : https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/Thumb/image?id=ark:/27020/ASJU-9725&mat=articleNumbaqCopyright (c) 2015 Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"Euskal metatesiak: abiaburua haien ikerketarako