<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-17T17:54:38Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/ASJU-9747">https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/oai</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/ASJU-9747</identifier><setSpec>ALL</setSpec><datestamp>2025-10-25T06:25:01Z</datestamp></header><metadata> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>https://www.bilketa.eus/ark:/27020/ASJU-9747</dc:identifier><dc:creator>Ariztimuño, Borja</dc:creator><dc:creator>Egurtzegi, Ander</dc:creator><dc:source>ASJU, 9747</dc:source><dc:date>2011-06-06</dc:date><dc:description>Artikulu honetan Mitxelenak (1961) proposaturiko etimologia bat berrartzen da ikuspuntu kritiko batetik. Berreraiketa lanean argudio fonologikoak arduraz erabiltzearen beharraz oharturik eta aitzineuskararen silaba/erro egituraz dugun ezagutza handiagoaz baliaturik etimologia zehatzago bat proposatu nahi da enara/elai bikotearentzat. Oraingo honetan, testuinguru fonologiko ezagun bati garrantzia handiagoa ematen zaio berreraikitako konstruktoen aurka. Honekin batera, aldaeren banaketa dialektologiko orokorra eta hainbat autorek aurkeztutako beste zenbait etimologia proposamen aipatuko dira.</dc:description><dc:description>This paper revisits an etymology first proposed by Mitxelena (1961) from a critical standpoint. Being aware of the necessity of a careful use of the phonological argumentation in reconstructive work and profiting our greater knowledge of the syllable/root structure of the Proto-Basque, we aim to propose a more accurate etymology for the enara/elai doublet. In this case, we prioritize the known phonological context to any hypothesized construct. In addition to this, we give account of the general dialectal distribution as well as some other proposals made by previous authors.</dc:description><dc:description>This paper revisits an etymology first proposed by Mitxelena (1961) from a critical standpoint. Being aware of the necessity of a careful use of the phonological argumentation in reconstructive work and profiting our greater knowledge of the syllable/root structure of the Proto-Basque, we aim to propose a more accurate etymology for the enara/elai doublet. In this case, we prioritize the known phonological context to any hypothesized construct. In addition to this, we give account of the general dialectal distribution as well as some other proposals made by previous authors.</dc:description><dc:identifier>https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/9747/8987</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://ojs.ehu.eus/index.php/ASJU/article/view/9747</dc:identifier><dc:relation>vignette : https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/Thumb/image?id=ark:/27020/ASJU-9747&amp;mat=articleNum</dc:relation><dc:language>baq</dc:language><dc:rights>Copyright (c) 2015 Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca "Julio de Urquijo"</dc:rights><dc:title>Enarak, elaiak eta testuinguruaren garrantzia</dc:title></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>