<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-18T01:18:30Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/Artxiker-00741173">https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/oai</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:www.bilketa.eus:ark:/27020/Artxiker-00741173</identifier><setSpec>ALL</setSpec><datestamp>2025-07-20T17:00:08Z</datestamp></header><metadata> <oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>https://www.bilketa.eus/ark:/27020/Artxiker-00741173</dc:identifier><dc:contributor>Centre de recherche sur la langue et les textes basques (IKER)</dc:contributor><dc:creator>Etxeberria, Urtzi (19..-....)</dc:creator><dc:source>IKER, artxibo-00741173</dc:source><dc:date>2011</dc:date><dc:description>In joint work (Giannakidou 2004, Etxeberria 2005, Etxeberria and Giannakidou 2010), we argue that one of the functions a D head can perform in language is to provide domain restriction. For this, we propose a new mode of composition for D--DDR. DDR is a type-shifting of D from its "regular" individual yielding function (iota) to a modifier function supplying the context set variable C. In Greek, St'át'imcets Salish, and Basque we find DDR applying to Q, but in St'át'imcets, the D-head shifts to DDR also when it combines with the NP under Q. Our analysis relies on Salish D being a definiteness head, since C is a discourse salient or familiar property; we thus challenge Matthewson's (1998, 2001) treatment of St'át'imcets Salish D as indefinite. Our goal here is to consider the St'át'imcets data and show that (a) the arguments for indefiniteness of D are not conclusive, and (b) the St'át'imcets facts are fully consistent with an analysis of DDR as a manifestation of definiteness. The St'át'imcets D, we will suggest, is best analyzed as a deictic, demonstrative-like D head, consistent with its morphology.</dc:description><dc:identifier>https://artxiker.ccsd.cnrs.fr/artxibo-00741173</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>https://artxiker.ccsd.cnrs.fr/artxibo-00741173v1/file/etxeberria_giannakidou1.pdf</dc:identifier><dc:format>Rapport | Txostena</dc:format><dc:relation>vignette : https://www.bilketa.eus/in/rest/Thumb/image?id=ark:/27020/Artxiker-00741173&amp;mat=articleNum</dc:relation><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:rights>Archive ouverte HAL | HAL artxibo irekia</dc:rights><dc:subject>Determinatzaile definitua</dc:subject><dc:subject>kuantifikatzaile sendoak</dc:subject><dc:subject>domeinuaren murriztapena</dc:subject><dc:subject>Hiztegigintza - Semantika - Pragmatika</dc:subject><dc:subject>Lexicographie - Sémantique - Pragmatique</dc:subject><dc:title>D-heads, domain restriction, and variation: from Greek and Basque to St'at'imcets Salish</dc:title></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>